City leader scolds police for ‘lack of response’ to protests at her home (as city council calls to defund police)

City leader scolds police for ‘lack of response’ to protests
at her home (as city council calls to defund police) 1

Richmond, Virginia – While members of the Richmond City Council are in the midst of talking about defunding the police department, one of their very own council members got a swift taste of the bad side of the mob they’re considering caving to.

And, ironically, the council member is upset that police didn’t intervene to the level of her desire.

Richmond City Councilwoman Kim Gray managed to attract some uninvited guests outside of her home on the evening of July 15th, and apparently no arrests have been made with regard to the large number of protesters that gathered outside of her home.

In a confessional-styled video, the Gray stated the following:

“Not one person charged, no citations, nothing. I mean what has it come to?”

The reason that Gray is so upset isn’t just that a crowd had gathered outside of the home – it was the criminal threats allegedly said from those within the crowd that had her scared. According to Gray, people began suggesting to burn down her home:

Price & Product Availability Tracker

Discover where products are available & compare prices

“Recognizing and understanding that I’m a single Black person, a single mom with Black children in my home… showing up in a violent way at my home, is not a way to protest violence against Black people. You’re doing the exact thing that you say you need to fight against.”

The councilmember said she called police that evening, and not a single unit arrived on the scene:

“When we as citizens call for help… we need to see a presence and there needs to be consequences.”

Richmond Police said that they were aware of Gray’s call, and admitted to monitoring the situation nearby to see if there were any actions that posed a danger to overall public safety. However, Gray says that waiting for something to go awry isn’t enough:

“That’s an unsettling response to say we are going to allow laws to be broken and your family to be put in potential jeopardy because we don’t want to have another negative interaction with the crowd.”

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

Yet, how can anyone be surprised at how Richmond Police reacted to a call over a crowd of protesters gathering? Over the past several weeks, seemingly any type of enforcement against illegal acts during protests have gotten the likes of the RPD admonished at every corner.

Back in June, when rioters blocked a police SUV from leaving an area – and the SUV simply tried to go around the crowd, they continued to surround the vehicle some got tipped over by the SUV. Richmond’s own Mayor Stoney called for the officer who tried to get out of the rioters’ way to be placed on leave.

The ACLU actually tried to place a restraining order last month against police in Virginia to ban them from using tear gas and pepper spray as a means to clear unlawful assemblies.

The RPD’s own Chief of Police “resigned” in mid-June because of trying to get protests under control and enacting arrests.

In a sense, police in Richmond are probably worried of being accused of “escalating” matters if trying to arrest protesters engaging in illegal behavior akin to blocking the flow of traffic or alleged threats of rioting at this point.

Steve Neal, who serves as a crime expert for the local CBS 6, explained that this kind of conundrum isn’t just happening in Richmond – it’s a nationwide impasse:

“It’s what’s going on everywhere in the country right now.”

Neal noted that whenever police are inserting themselves into protests, it becomes the catch-22 of one person saying they’re a victim of the mob and then protesters claiming a violation of their rights:

“One person has just as much right to be protected as another. So, law enforcement has to make some decisions and it seems in some cases, politics are being used as the deciding point rather than what might be best for community safety or the individual’s safety.”

It’s as if police are in a situation of damned if they do, damned if they don’t.

Because if someone has a protest outside their home that becomes unruly and police don’t start enacting arrests – then they’re bad for not doing it. Yet, when police start arresting people present within these protests, then you have clamoring about police seemingly arresting people for “no reason”.


Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today?  With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.  

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing!  (See image below.)  Thanks for being a part of the LET family!

Facebook Follow First

Read the Full Article

Alternative News, Civil Unrest

Prepare Now Before its too Late

Discover where products are available & compare prices

Trump tells supporters that telephone rallies will replace large, in-person events until 'Covid-19 problem' is solved
CDC: You shouldn’t be wearing one of these instead of a face mask – here’s why

You might also like