By Peter Tocci
Introduction
What do coronavirus and money/currency have in common? As with
so many things in this psychological operation we call society, it
matters not what they are, but what people believe they are and
their corresponding behavior.
With things like U.S. states declaring states of emergency over
single cases of COVID-19, and Governor Cuomo trying to call out
federal troops, this media-borne Virus-Fear episode has taken on
surreal proportion against the particulars on the ground.
It’s been suggested rightly that few certainties exist about
the COVID-19 pandemic. Accuracy of statistics particularly have
been in question. Faulty testing either up or down, and potential
deliberate biasing play into the picture.
Most remarkable for me, as implied, is the huge disconnect
between numbers, accurate or not, and perceived threat. At this
moment, 228,784 cases globally. Flu would be millions by 3 months
into a season. Coronavirus 2 is not precisely flu, but there are
similarities. It’s at 135,160 active, with 70,535 recovered in
China. Praise societal programming and the media.
Certainly, no secret, economic impact is becoming cataclysmic,
regardless of the intensity of the pandemic. How many would global
economic collapse kill – in so many ways?
Silly me, I’ve not questioned “COVID-19” being used to
refer to the virus, whereas, it’s officially the “disease”
caused by what was 2019-nCoV, but which is now referred to by the
US
CDC as “coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)” No more year or
“n”.
Later we’ll analyze information from two highly regarded
‘insider’ luminaries. The first is University of Illinois
Professor of Law Francis A. Boyle, noted for drafting the US
Biological Weapons Anti-terrorism Act of 1989. Reports have
misconstrued that history, as we’ll see.
The second source is China-born Jennifer Zeng, top journalist
and blogger with a large following. Both insiders hold, among other
things, that a virus causing the COVID-19 epidemics and pandemic is
a bioweapon that ‘leaked.’ And, in Ms Zeng’s case, that
things in China are much worse than officially stated.
Given the outstanding history and credentials of these two, one
is tempted to accept their views without question. But for this
writer, certain aspects merit scrutiny.
There’s lots of speculative ‘fun’ to be had within the
expansive sphere of possibilities. We’ll hopefully shed some
light on the ‘funnier’ examples along the way, while looking at
some key details rarely considered.
Testing
I’m not absolutely certain about other countries, but history
shows that US “health” agencies – NIH/CDC under HHH – are
overseen by, and serve — one could say are “operating arms”
of — Big Pharma-Medical. With ’Pharma Cartel’ wielding global
power, and standing to profit immensely, one might have to be a bit
naive to think official sources elsewhere are ‘innocent’.
Test kits recommended by the FDA/CDC use the “PCR” method,
or Polymerase Chain Reaction. It’s basically ‘amplification’
of an unidentifiably small amount of genetic protein, to make
enough to then be identified.
CDC page says test kits are “…intended for use by
laboratories designated by CDC as qualified, and in the United
States, certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement
Amendments (CLIA) to perform high complexity tests” [emphasis
added].
After initial delays especially due to a faulty batch of kits,
finally on 3/12/20 81 state and local public health laboratories in
50 states and the District of Columbia have successfully verified
COVID-19 diagnostic tests and are
offering testing. CDC removed the statement: “The test will
not be available in U.S. hospitals or other primary care
settings.” But it seems that’s the case, as the labs are taking
over.
CDC: “The test kits also will be shipped to qualified
international laboratories, such as World Health Organization (WHO)
and Global Influenza Surveillance Response System (GISRS)
laboratories.”
GISRS? Who knew? Influenza – serious biz.
Quite interesting, then, is that CDC-approved kits will be sent
via the International Reagent Resource (IRR), formerly named
Influenza Reagent Resource (IRR) — an agency established by the
CDC. One wouldn’t be blamed for surprise and thinking that the
WORLD Health Organization would be the one directing all this.
But it seems that CDC fingerprints are on the testing program at
every step. Does this suggest to anyone a global “funnel”
effect?
PCR accuracy is plagued by two issues. The first is false
positives caused by something called “crossover contamination”.
This is
a major problem in “…using amplification techniques
routinely, as in a regulatory agency such as the Food and Drug
Administration…” not to mention labs doing corona tests.
Secondly, the test is excruciatingly complex, containing
multiple points for potential error. First, just scan
this page. Then take a look at the procedure.
Meanwhile, another test exists that shows potential. It’s
called ViroCap: “With this test, you don’t have to know what
you’re looking for,” said the study’s senior author…
https://source.wustl.edu/2015/09/new-test-detects-all-viruses-that-infect-people-animals/
“researchers evaluated the new test in two sets of biological
samples – for example, from blood, stool and nasal
secretions…” How much simpler can you get?
Apparently, it’s not expensive, so you won’t need an
“Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast DX Real-Time PCR Instrument with
SDS 1.4 software” $$. Could this slow down its acceptance?
Alas, it seems both tests suffer a similar deficiency in that
they detect a presence (qualitative) but not the viral load
(quantitative). This is key because of the ongoing presence in the
body of very low levels of various microorganisms doing nothing,
such as incubating. Viruses in such a state don’t make symptoms
and can’t be transmitted. Example: herpes has to flare up.
Don’t confuse this with “asymptomatic transmission”.
Statistics
There are a number of incidence “trackers” on the Net, one
being U. of Virginia’s COVID-19 Surveillance Dashboard.
It has coincided closely for the last few weeks with the
interactive map at Johns Hopkins University, as well as other
trackers. It had been suspect in some minds because JHU School of
Public Health and the Gates Foundation hosted Event 201 on
10/18/19, a tabletop pandemic exercise modeled on a coronavirus
shortly before the outbreak. But it seems as accurate as any,
except note how the red dots make things look like the world is on
fire
There has been remarkable consistency in statistics across
sources. We have to settle somewhere in the sea of doubt, so the
two cited above will be used for discussion.
Lethality from the outset running around 3.4-3.6% with overall
recovery hovering around 50%, including China. What reason might
there be for Pharma/Elite controlled agencies to understate? It
certainly doesn’t look like an attempt by central authority to
overstate. Apparently, that’s the media’s job.
Societal Manipulation
Before getting to the analysis noted above, I’d like to share
some thoughts from having also spent much time looking into a
rarely detailed level of societal influence/control, the
supranational financial power Elite residing atop a massive power
structure (there might be a level beyond, but we won’t go there)
before whom (infiltrated) governments and the corporate monolith
genuflect, and whose policy they execute. That executed policy I
call Drama, or symptoms of their manipulations. Drama includes the
money factor (more below).
How power operates and to what ends is the complex subject of
books. Carroll Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope is an example, as well as Antony
Sutton’s Trilaterals Over Washington (with Patrick Wood),
and America’s Secret Establishment (Sutton’s
“magnum opus”).
But briefly, as detailed in Trilaterals, the structure consists,
top down, of policy setters (the “Elite”), policy holders, and
policy executors (where the Drama lives and includes banks,
corporations, NGOs, individuals and more). Research has long
identified a single-minded Agenda — total world domination and
control, with many supporting sub-routines and tactics, including
propaganda and media-control, which are carried out by the
corporatocracy.
One Elite ‘specialty’ is the creation and reinforcement in
society of beliefs and belief systems, as mentioned in the opening.
These are often exploited to create fear and anxiety, two of the
best control mechanisms. Thus, the coronavirus-induced
shutdown?
A consistent occurrence in previous ‘world-killer’ viral
outbreaks is the eventual money-flood. Billions are currently being
deployed and proffered to “control” and “fight” COVID-19.
From banks, it’s debt slavery, a variation on the “Economic Hit Man” theme.
On 6 March, “President Trump signed an
$8.3 billion spending bill … aimed at fighting the
coronavirus outbreak… The bill will fund the development of
vaccines, medications to treat the disease and diagnostic tests…
[emphasis added].
He said he didn’t think Americans were too worried about the
coronavirus. “I don’t think they’re panicking,” Trump said
at the bill signing. “It’ll go away.” Well, he should have
been in the supermarkets to witness the Black Friday of food.
Cowardly hoarders making sure they’ll be safe, ignoring the fact
that their fellow human beings might be in need.
It’s like a dinner for 12 people, and three rush in ahead and
eat 90% of it before the rest arrive. Reprehensible.
A week later, Trump money was up to $50 bn. Interesting would be
to find out where most of it flows.
For many analysts, “follow the money” answers all questions.
It’s suggested this applies only to a point in the power
structure. For the psychopaths at the top, money is not primary.
Control is. Not that they don’t gain financially, because
that’s just how their creation – the system – is set up.
But is money a primary motive here? Is it what drives policy? Is
it a fundamental goal or a manipulative mechanism? Drama, in other
words?
As suggested, the top level, operating above the law, sets
policy, while lower levels hand it down and execute it. Lower
levels are more visible, often regarded as “the perps.” It
works much like Mafia contracts vs. triggermen. So greed is
exploited at the Drama level to elicit/influence choices and
actions that advance the overriding global Agenda, whether players
are aware or not. And many are not.
What follows the money-flood this time is the main concern: The
pattern has been that once the dam breaks, the world-killer threat
begins to fade. Fizzle time. A big difference here has been the
level of panic and extreme isolation practices created for this one
almost out of the gate. Question is, will the draconian policy
fizzle, and if so, will it do so in time to revive the dying global
economy.
History
Again, though coronavirus 2 is not precisely flu, there is much
in common. Flu “season” is roughly the cold part of the year
geographically. Let’s give it 6 months. Though there are flu
‘waves,’ most seasons are in full swing by 3 months from
onset.
A look at the history of flu pandemics is instructive. Scroll
down
this page to the “Influenza pandemics” chart. Note the
Name, Date, Subtype and Deaths Worldwide columns.
Totaling the rough death estimates conservatively, we see that
“flu” has killed around 57 million people in the last century
or so. Over 7 million per pandemic on average. Of course,
“Spanish” heavily biases the average. Least deadly was 2009
Swine flu, a new strain, at 151,700 low estimate; most, the
“Spanish,” at 100 million, high estimate. ‘Halfway’ through
SARS-CoV-2 ‘season’ (3 months), we have now a worldwide total
of around 9,321 alleged deaths. These must be parsed as well,
because relatively few die of the virus itself (more later).
Despite awareness of the rapid spread and large number of flu
cases (in spite of the poison needle), no great panic,
lockdown/shutdown and threat to collapse the global economy has
even been suggested.
Yet, as coronavirus 2 was a mere couple of steps out of the
gate, panic generation began in the media, with a sharp rise in
that curve later in the young ‘season.’ panic intensity has
increased since then, for numbers that just don’t warrant it.
Of course, we have no sound data point now, due to draconian
stupidity now in progress. It might eventually be given the credit
for saving lives while creating a living disaster that could easily
more than make up the difference. Alsoi, corona 2, a new strain,
certainly hasn’t stood up to its predicted 15-17% lethality.
It’s been under 4%, which cannot be attributed to stupidity.
Why has authority ‘accepted’ flu death in a sense, but gone
hysterical over a pandemic their own incidence statistics show to
be a pussy cat? Thus, the most important question of all arises, as
others have asked: “What is the ultimate purpose of this
manufactured Fear-of-Virus episode?” We might be nearing the
point of finding out — at least about what step this is toward
the global-fascist system.
China’s lockdown procedure has been praised by WHO and
President Trump. China has set the bar and governments, national
and within nations, won’t hesitate to “do the responsible
thing” in the face of a threat, real or not. Widespread
lockdowns/quarantines could be a preamble to the introduction of
any number of additional totalitarian unpleasantries, including
“gunpoint” vaccination.
A major tactic cited to facilitate full implementation of the
control Agenda is a third world war, bringing nations to their
knees, preparing for acceptance of the ‘Global Solution.’
Another tactic is global economic collapse, which could be caused
without a virus. Response from the ‘Belief-Corona’ eminently
serves the latter, as we see looming, and perhaps less directly,
the former. Power has repeatedly shown its ability to concoct and
orchestrate war. Just pick any major one.
Instability is built into the rigged and crooked economic
system, which can easily be influenced to create booms and busts
(e.g., housing bubble): The Great Depression resulting from the
Stock Market crash was not accidental. It was a carefully contrived
occurrence….The international bankers sought to bring about a
condition of despair here so they might emerge as rulers of us all.
– Louis McFadden US Congressman (R-PA) 1915-1935, Chairman of
House Banking and Currency Committee. Poisoned in 1936.
Well-intentioned and courageous as he was, McFadden apparently
didn’t realize banksters, or Elite families, had been ruling
(manipulating) the roost for centuries, and royalty/aristocracy
long before that. That episode was just a major transfer of
wealth.
One of the ‘planks’ in the psychopaths’ control-system
platform is the cashless society – a lip-smacking Elite liberty
killer. We know China destroyed a huge amount of cash to ‘stop
the spread.’ And folks are generally being advised to use
digital/plastic exclusively to ‘stop the spread.’ Conditioning
for what’s planned?
One of the more clever Elite tactics is called the ‘reverse
psyop’ (RP). It operated in the CO2/climate change controversy.
From the outset, everyone, especially CO2 believers, reacted to
fossil-fuelers and associates as being in “climate denial,” a
term intended to skirt reason.. Thus, ‘denial’ by the
earth-wrecking evil ones reinforces the desired belief. Even if
it’s untrue. The Bad-Guy Reverse psyop.
Previously, the global government/control-system, often called
the New World Order, looked like it would operate supranationally
via business structures (e.g., trade zones), but the MO now seems
to be virtual hive-mind domination in the technosphere. “You will
be assimilated.”
The control-system foundation is wireless technology per se —
“5G” included, not “5G” alone, which nonsense constantly
bombards us. This is a theme in the writings of this author. See
section The Real Reason for the Wireless
“Season”? in
Wireless Technology: Ultra Convenient. Endlessly Entertaining.
Criminally Instigated. Terminally Pathological.
COVID-19 and the “5G” crisis have something else in common
– concocted hysteria. For the documented evidence on “5G,”
please see also
What Do YOU Mean When You Say “5G”? (Revision/Update
1/24/20) and
Geneva Telecom Antenna Map Illustrates How the “Stop 5G!”
Campaign Misleads Supporters.
Analysis
In an InfoWars®/Alex Jones interview (transcript
here), Professor Boyle says he’s been attacked “… for
being a conspiracy theorist [also intended to skirt reason] and
fake news and I’m a nutcase and a nut job and everything else.
… And indeed, as I told you before, I’d been completely
censored out of all the mainstream news media here in the United
States.”
NOTE: There is no intent by any means to ‘accuse’ Professor
Boyle of collusion. Just saying his work may ipso facto be playing
into the hands of any possible fear-mongering-perpetrators in a
Good-Guy reverse-psyop-like way, because the bioweapon hypothesis
carries additional weight if the persecuted one says it’s true.
Still, the case merits scrutiny. It’s not cut and dry as
presented.
We should be aware, for example, that the complete title of the
1989 Act is: An Act to implement the Convention on the Prohibition
of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological
(Biological) and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction, by
prohibiting certain conduct relating to biological weapons, and for
other purposes.
In other words, “An Act” to implement an international
resolution previously signed by over 100 countries — in 1972,
effective 1975. While weapon research raged, it took only a mere 14
years for the Good Guys to comply. Reports have said incorrectly
that “Boyle’s Law,” if you’ll excuse the pun, was
‘adopted globally.’ In the interview reviewed here and in two
others, no attempt was made to clarify this.
A related historical note is that the resolution became lip
service — a de facto PR smokescreen. The purpose attributed to
the research changed from offensive-weapon to the whiter lily of
“defense.” Other than that, not much changed. None of the big
players ‘trusted’ the other guy’s adherence. Secret research
has been a threat since. Military facilities with “internal”
budgets being the best venues. Elite controlled.
The move recalls for me how, after WW I, leftover
organophosphate WMDs virtually had the labels changed and became
the wonderful new chemicals for industrial agriculture.
“Virus-Fear” becomes amplified and is exploited, whether
‘the’ virus is weaponized (which term itself can vary in
meaning), or not – despite what science papers are interpreted to
mean. As we’ll see, even ‘bioweapon’ can have different
connotations.
A key point rarely mentioned about infectious
pandemics/epidemics is that they’re inherently life-cyclic.
Individuals may perish, even in large numbers, but it seems
there’s a failsafe mechanism built in. Examples are the Black
Plague, Bubonic, and the “Spanish flu”. Although many perished,
the three burned themselves out without any help from conventional
medical wizardry, thank you.
One might reply that those weren’t bioweapons, although the
case has been made that the “Spanish flu,” though
‘officially’ blamed on Chinese slaves laborers working behind
the lines in WW I, resulted from massive vaccination of US troops
sent into WW I. If so, it had that tint of artificiality.
The most important fact, however, is that it was neither Spanish
nor flu. Bacterial
pneumonia killed the vast majority of people. And this is an
important lesson on flu pandemics in general, because most flu
victims don’t die of it. Abstract: “…data from the subsequent
1957 [Asian] and 1968 [Hong Kong] pandemics are consistent with
these findings.” It’s been published that the virus has been
identified (H1N1), but somehow the killers – pneumo, strep, and
staph – don’t get the same respect. See
also.
The following is from a 2/29/20 CDC Telebriefing Update on
COVID-19. Dr Duchin: “…people who are having the most severe
impact of this disease are those who are older, those who are
medically fragile, for example with chronic underlying health
conditions — and I’m talking about the same conditions that
we’re used to hearing about with seasonal influenza, chronic
cardiac disease, lung disease, diabetes and other conditions…”
Do we need to shut down the world to protect this sector of the
population?
Thus, though COVID-19 symptoms vary somewhat from flu, its
impact on underlying conditions seems to be quite similar.
The cyclic quality of infectious pandemics is not stressed by
advocates of the poison needle, because during the ‘classic’
period of pandemics, it helped create the illusion of efficacy by
introducing vaccines on the later downside of the
cycle.
